a small dose of reality

keeping it semi real, promoting conservatives, taking potshots at fools, democrats other than Obama, liberals, the left, know it alls, the dnc, etc., reviews of models, pundits and blogs

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              "I'd rather entrust the government of the United States to the first 400 people in the Boston

 telephone directory than to the faculty of Harvard University."     - William F. Buckley, Jr.

 

2007/1/27

terrorist muslim jihad islamist Threat Realities Ignored by liberals

@ 12:11 PM (34 months, 10 days ago)

 

THE BIGGEST OBSTACLE TO PRESERVING AMERICAN VALUES ARE AMERICAN DEMOCRAT LIBERALS WITH THE ALLEGED BRAINS UP THEIR BUTTS.  AFTER THEY ARE SILENCED,

We have four options:

1.  We can defeat the Jihad now, before it gets nuclear weapons.

2.  We can fight the Jihad later, after it gets nuclear weapons (which may be as early as next year, if Iran's progress on nuclear weapons is what Iran claims it is)

3.  We can surrender to the Jihad and accept its dominance in the Middle East, now, in Europe in the next few years or decades, and ultimately in America.

4.  Or, we can stand down now, and pick up the fight later when the Jihad is more widespread and better armed, perhaps after the Jihad has dominated France and Germany and maybe most of the rest of Europe.  It will, of course, be more dangerous, more expensive, and much bloodier.

If you oppose this war, I hope you like the idea that your children, or grandchildren, may live in an Islamic America under the Mullahs and the Sharia, an America that resembles Iran today.

The history of the world is the history of civilizational clashes, cultural clashes.  All wars are about ideas, ideas about what society and civilization should be like, and the most determined always win.

Those who are willing to be the most ruthless always win The pacifists always lose, because the anti-pacifists kill them.  Remember, perspective is every thing, and America's schools teach too little history for perspective to be clear, especially in the young American mind.

The Cold war lasted from about 1947 at least until the Berlin Wall came down in 1989.  Forty-two years.  Europe spent the first half of the 19th century fighting Napoleon, and from 1870 to 1945 fighting Germany World War II began in 1928, lasted 17 years, plus a ten year occupation, and the US still has troops in Germany and Japan.
World War II resulted in the death of more than 50 million people, maybe more than 100 million people, depending on which estimates you accept.

The US has taken more than 2,000 killed in action in Iraq.  The US took more than 4,000 killed in action on the morning of June 6,
1944, the first day of the Normandy Invasion to rid Europe of Nazi Imperialism.  In W.W.II the US averaged 2,000 KIA a week -- for four years.  Most of the individual battles of W.W.II lost more Americans than the entire Iraq war has done so far.

But the stakes are at least as high ...  A world dominated by representative governments with civil rights, human rights, and personal freedoms ...  or a world dominated by a radical Islamic Wahhabi movement, by the Jihad, under the Mullahs and the Sharia (Islamic law).

It's difficult to understand why the American left does not grasp this.  They favor human rights, civil rights, liberty and freedom, but evidently not for Iraqis.

"Peace Activists" always seem to demonstrate here in America, where it's safe.

Why don't we see Peace Activist demonstrating in Iran, Syria, Iraq, Sudan, North Korea, in the places that really need peace activism the most?

The liberal mentality is supposed to favor human rights, civil rights, democracy, multiculturalism, diversity, etc., but if the Jihad wins, wherever the Jihad wins, it is the end of civil rights, human rights, democracy, multiculturalism, diversity, etc.

 

Copywrite 2007  -  Barry G.

 

Comment(s) »

  1. Hi A.S,D,O,R,, now a regular reader, agree with a lot that you say, bits that i don't understand as i'm english, but,
    in my opinion the terrorists always win in the end so, with three different groups of them in iraq, maybe it would be better to withdraw and let them fight it out with each other, thus preserving the lifes of our servicemen, and, hopefully, having just one group to "deal" with in the future.

    Comment by trevor downer— 2007/01/28 @ 12:23 PM — (Reply)

  2. I THINK WE'VE PASSED THAT EXIT TOO LATE AGO TREVOR...

    Comment by jim— 2007/01/29 @ 08:53 PM — (Reply)

  3. libs have been on the wrong side of history more times than not.

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2007/01/29 @ 09:12 AM — (Reply)

  4. 1 news station reported the "HOLOCOST" exhibit, being shown in Dallas,A young teen was asked what she thought???her reply...."I WISH WE COULD HAVE DONE SOMETHING FOR THEM" !!!!! PERHAPS SHE WASNT TOLD THAT WE (THEU.S.) DID DO SOMETHING....AND IT WAS CALLED WORLD WAR 2....HUMMMMM NO HISTORY CLASS THAT YEAR.......

    Comment by jim— 2007/01/29 @ 09:47 AM — (Reply)

  5. One just needs to take a look aver at Europe, the land of the dead, to see what liberalism has done, that is unless you are a muslim, then you can see how easy is to take over countries without any weapons or disease (that is if you don't want to call Islam a disease). Europe is basically gone, a post-Christian society being ramrodded by Islam and its "youths". Unless we want to end up like that, its time to take out the big boys and drop the 'em on the jihadists.

    Comment by Joe Gringo— 2007/01/29 @ 02:11 PM — (Reply)

  6. Have you ever been to Europe, Joe?

    Comment by Abe— 2007/01/30 @ 08:59 AM — (Reply)

  7. These people speak one language. It's time we laid it out in terms they understand.

    Comment by Brooke— 2007/01/29 @ 05:41 PM — (Reply)

  8. NEWS FLASH. TODAY IN IRAQ . SOLDIERS , BEING ALLOWED TO BE "SOLDIERS", BREAK UP TERRORIST'S NETWORK OPERATING IN NAJAF !!!! 100'S ENEMY KILLED !!

    Comment by jim— 2007/01/29 @ 06:30 PM — (Reply)

  9. EVER NOTICE..THE MORE WE SAY "NUKE ISLAMINAZI...THE MORE GLOBAL WAR "CHURNS" OUT ARTICLES FASTER AND FASTER???

    Comment by jim— 2007/01/29 @ 08:48 PM — (Reply)

  10. Jimbo, that's not a real person, it's spam. However that doesn't mean "it" shouldn't be nuked.

    Comment by Barry G.— 2007/01/29 @ 09:16 PM — (Reply)

  11. SPAM ...AS IN UNSOLICITED ADVERTIZEMENT ???

    Comment by jim— 2007/01/29 @ 09:51 PM — (Reply)

  12. Wow, dude. I've been waiting for someone to have the balls to say something like this.

    So where do we start? I mean, aren't we all like agreed that it's gotta be nukes, right? That's Brooke says... they only speak one language. And that language is nuklear, isn't it? If we don't nuke them, they'll nuke us. It's totally going to happen.

    Thing is, who do we nuke first? Can't nuke Iraq yet, bcoz are troops aer still there, and they thnik we'll take more time to get them out, so maybe we could start with Iran. Except, that's only next to Iraq, right? And if it's so close, wouldn't that mean we'd get like fallout on some of our like tropps, or something? Where can we start our holy war? Don't fool yourselves, guys, this is God's war, and the President has his hotline to God. We wouldn't be there if he didn't knoww what he wax doing.

    So where's left? Shouild it be Sirya? Or Maybe those hiills wher all the Taleban are hidding. Maybe that would be best. What do you guys thnik? Man, maybe I should join up. The chance to make something glow in the dark... hooowweee!

    Comment by Rob— 2007/01/30 @ 08:57 AM — (Reply)

  13. The mountains of the west and northwest should block off the nortwest winter winds from blowing fallout southwest to india ! smaller tactical nukes could be used for specifically targeted locations where highest concentration of islaminazi exsist !summer winds produce exact opposite fallout direction that could ruin someones day in a location where we dont want to so winter is best !

    Comment by aza spade— 2007/01/30 @ 09:43 AM — (Reply)

  14. That's totally cool. So you mean that, for definite, if I was like a bomber pilot and I was nukin these peeople, I could for sure know that my nukes would probably like only damage Indias crops or something? But wait up, indias Izlamic too right?

    Comment by Rob— 2007/01/30 @ 10:08 AM — (Reply)

  15. no thier hindu, the islaminazi want s to kill them too, dont worry about a "bomber" thats last generation...we have something diff....

    Comment by aza spade— 2007/01/30 @ 10:16 AM — (Reply)

  16. You point out some interesting logistical points Rob. However, events and timing can be orchestrated so it will all work. If it does happen, I have my personal space shuttle fueled and ready to take me to my domed ranch on Venus. Did you know that the atmosphere on Venus is ideal for buffalo?

    Comment by Barry G.— 2007/01/30 @ 06:38 PM — (Reply)

  17. Yes. I did.

    Comment by Rob— 2007/02/05 @ 08:02 AM — (Reply)

» Leave a comment


:mrgreen: :neutral: :twisted: :arrow: :shock: :smile: :???: :cool: :evil: :grin: :idea: :oops: :razz: :roll: :wink: :cry: :eek: :lol: :mad: :sad: :!: :?:

Preview:

You say:

To prevent spam, please type in the exact word you see in this image: CAPTCHA
To refresh the image, click here. Otherwise, contact us.

  • Your E-mail address is never displayed. If you enter it, it will only be visible to the blog author
  • Since there already are comments to this post, your eventual comment might trigger a notification e-mail to the persons that commented before you.
  • The line and paragraph breaks automatically

ViewMy Stats

    • ViewMy Stats