GOP Campaign Increasingly Resembling Unproduced Goldie Hawn Film
The GOP campaign for the White House is looking more and more like the screenplay for an unproduced Goldie Hawn film from the 1980's, a Goldie Hawn film expert said today.
Davis Logsdon, who teaches at the University of Minnesota's School of Film and is considered the world's foremost expert in the cinema of Goldie Hawn, said that in choosing Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin to be his running mate Sen. John McCain was taking a leaf from an unproduced Hawn vehicle from 1984 titled "Contestant in Chief."
"In the screenplay, an evil presidential candidate chooses the American he thinks is the least likely to catch on to his nefarious plans to destroy the country," Professor Logsdon said. "Enter Goldie, a former beauty pageant contestant, small-town mayor and hockey mom."
In keeping with the formula of Goldie Hawn movies in the 1980's, "She turns out to be smarter than she looks and exposes her running mate on national TV, becoming President herself in the process."
But Professor Logsdon cautioned that in the case of this year's GOP ticket, life will probably imitate art only up to a point: "In real life, if Gov. Palin becomes President she will most likely ban abortions, destroy wildlife habitats and blow up the world."
Elsewhere, Gov. Palin said she was looking forward to the vice-presidential debate, or as she called it, "the talent competition."
Copywrite 2008 - BG
Check out the official Barry G. website
Comment(s) »
» Leave a comment
- Your E-mail address is never displayed. If you enter it, it will only be visible to the blog author
- Since there already are comments to this post, your eventual comment might trigger a notification e-mail to the persons that commented before you.
- The line and paragraph breaks automatically





















Comment by Burns— 2008/09/05 @ 03:29 PM — (Reply)
Comment by Burns— 2008/09/05 @ 04:39 PM — (Reply)
Comment by jim— 2008/09/05 @ 08:47 PM — (Reply)
BG
Comment by Barry G.— 2008/09/05 @ 09:00 PM — (Reply)
http://www.cheap-oakley-store.com
Comment by oakley outlet— 2012/04/18 @ 11:09 PM — (Reply)
I suppose, if these events are helping us all find a blog to drop anchor in a world adrift, it must be a good thing.Plus, with a slew of awesome http://www.usacoachfactoryoutlet.net/ coach factory outlet sets to choose from (nail polish, makeup, and fragrance, oh my!) Sometimes on our busy fashion forum it's nice to spend some time chatting about friends, family, and even the random things that make up our busy and varied lives.The markdowns we're talking about are pretty serious, meaning you can score deals on coco chanel finds like http://www.coachpursessaleusa.net/ cheap coach purses, and cute jewels. This coach factory bag is a tried and true celeb fave - so much so that it makes an appearance in the majority of editions of coach outlet online "The Coach Bags of;"Coach outlet online is a great place to make memories with personalized coach outlet store online purses, and right now, they're a great place to save some cash too!f popularized, this process could not only create a market for the tropical countries in which the plants grow, but could also bring make natural and chemical-free products more readily available. Their research led them to a breakthrough discovery; "coach purses outlet", a unique combination of five essential oils from the coach bags outlet - lavender, geranium, rosemary, cypress and thyme - that became the key to the future skincare line.However, perhaps the highlight of the interview came at the end when Coach outlet gave a heartfelt message for those most affected by the coach crossbody bags.The addition of a special agent to the dyeing recipe makes the garment antidrop. This new offering, made in USA, exudes the scent of lilies on a small, portable tag that can be used to brighten up anything from coach purse to hotel rooms - thus allowing the user to travel long distances with a hassle-free way of avoiding stagnant- and stale-smelling coach purse.
Comment by coach factory outlet— 2012/12/23 @ 02:28 AM — (Reply)